Latin
Lately, I've been really getting into.... podcasts. Previosuly, I'd never quite had a good 'set-up' in my life to make listening to them useful, but that changed and now I'm on the bandwagon. I mostly, though, listen to target language podcasts
Language
Recently, I crunched some personal numbers. Using Italian Athenaze, a text I'm reading for CI purposes, I clocked myself reading about a page of text (approx 130 Greek words) at 50 secs a page, which calculated out at 156 wpm. That's pretty decent, I would say,
Uncategorized
Interviewer: So, your CV has a lot of Greek on it, but Bill Smith the Third here is our New Testament lecturer and will be covering that area. Me: ὦ, καλῶς. σὺ εἶ διδάσκακλος τῆς ἑλληινκῆς γλώσσης; Bill: Um, what did you say? Me: σὺ δύνῃ λαλεῖν ἑλληνιστί; ἐγώ σοι
Uncategorized
So, you’ve become convinced (probably by someone else) that communicative/comprehensible input based approaches to language acquisition are the way to go. But you still need to produce students who have an explicit, and often advanced, knowledge of grammar. That is, you want students to acquire language but you
Uncategorized
How much input can you get? I ran some numbers... Average conversation speed is, apparently 140-160 words a minute. We can understand speeech much faster, but we don't like to produce speech much faster. Let's be conservative though, and say that we are gettin 100
Uncategorized
Reading in 3s is a way to structure reading a text so that you cover it 3 times over, sequentially. This is easiest explained by a 3-page model: you read 3 pages, but you only move your bookmark forward one page each session. Thus, you're always reading
Greek
It's a fair question (raised by my also-interested-in-linguistics-wife). Here's my short answer: a communicative approach will produce better readers, with better reading ability, faster. To understand why I hold that position, we need two puzzle pieces: how Grammar/Translation thinks it creates
Uncategorized
If we take the figure of 98% vocabulary coverage as what is needed to read a text at a comprehensible and 'fluent' level, so that the unknown 2% is understandable by context or not significant enough to frustrate understanding, then for the New Testament corpus, that requires learning
Uncategorized
One of the critiques I (πολλάκις; ἐνίοτε;) encounter about a living language methodology is that it’s slow. That it doesn’t get us directly to reading texts (the main interest of most historical language students), That it is inefficient (why do I need to learn the word for ‘butcheress’
Uncategorized
I’m surprised how often this question comes up. But I’m asked this relatively commonly. First, a very, very brief précis of the main options 1. Reconstructed Koine (Buth or Buth-similar options) 2. Erasmian (US) 3. Restored Attic (Allen-Daitz) 4. Modern 5. UK traditional Erasmian is what
Uncategorized
Inspired by a recent conversation, and again a question that I get every now and again. My suggestion is to weight your reading towards the easy (anything you can read with 98-100% comprehension, at a good reading pace), with some intermediate (anything you can read with 90% comprehension, and
Uncategorized
A couple of people have asked me recently what this is like, and expressed something of their frustration that they can't go from "mental translation" to "thinking in (Greek, Latin, Hebrew, Klingon)" I do think this is hard to explain, especially if you haven&